The Sandiganbayan has removed former public works secretary
Manuel Bonoan from the plunder and graft cases tied to the alleged corruption
in flood control projects, a development that could place him in a position to
cooperate with prosecutors as a state witness.
The ruling came after the prosecution asked the anti-graft
court’s Fifth Division to drop Bonoan as an accused. The move was supported by
Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla, who said Bonoan could provide testimony
relevant to corruption cases being prepared against former House speaker Martin
Romualdez.
Bonoan had originally faced one plunder charge and two
counts of graft over allegations involving approximately P573 million in
kickbacks connected to flood control projects. His removal from the cases
before the Fifth Division significantly changes his legal position. He now
remains subject to a separate, bailable graft case being handled by the
Sandiganbayan’s Second Division.
The distinction is particularly significant because the
Second Division had earlier rejected the prosecution’s attempt to exclude
Bonoan, finding insufficient basis for the request at the time. With the Fifth
Division now granting the motion, however, Bonoan could potentially secure
temporary freedom from his hospital arrest at the PNP General Hospital because
he has already posted bail in the remaining case.
The prosecution had sought to narrow one of the graft cases
by identifying Sen. Jinggoy Estrada as the sole accused. Estrada is alleged to
have received P213.75 million, equivalent to 25 percent of purported kickbacks
from two Department of Public Works and Highways projects in Bulacan.
Earlier allegations indicated that Bonoan and Estrada
allegedly coordinated to facilitate budget insertions connected to the
projects. Bonoan’s possible transition from accused to cooperating witness
could therefore provide prosecutors with additional testimony as they pursue
broader corruption cases.
Remulla has specifically linked Bonoan’s potential testimony
to cases being developed against Romualdez. The former speaker, however, has
denied wrongdoing, while his camp has accused the Ombudsman of pressuring
Bonoan to produce evidence against him, particularly concerning alleged
irregularities in the budget process.
The controversy gained further political significance after
President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced during his July State of the Nation
Address that criminal charges were being prepared against Romualdez. Marcos
also said he would not intervene in the proceedings.
Meanwhile, allegations surrounding the supposed delivery of
cash kickbacks to Romualdez have faced setbacks. Several former Marines who had
previously accused themselves of transporting suitcases containing alleged
kickback money have since withdrawn those accusations.
Bonoan’s exclusion from the Fifth Division cases does not amount to a finding that the underlying allegations are false or that other accused officials are cleared. Instead, it reflects a prosecutorial strategy in which an individual facing charges may be removed from a particular case to potentially assist the government in pursuing wider corruption investigations.

Comments
Post a Comment