Philippines Data Residency Law Seen as Key to Boosting Data Center Investments

 

The Philippines could attract more data center investments and strengthen its position in Southeast Asia by requiring businesses to store certain digital information within the country, industry leaders said.

A proposed data residency law could provide investors with greater confidence in the country's long-term commitment to digital infrastructure while encouraging more companies to establish local data centers. Industry representatives also believe such legislation could support the growth of the sector's capital market, particularly as VITRO Inc. prepares for its planned initial public offering (IPO).

Colliers Philippines research director Joey Bondoc said legislation would demonstrate the government's long-term support for data center development. He noted that a law approved by Congress and signed by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. could help establish a stronger policy foundation for the industry amid growing concerns over its environmental impact.

Data centers require substantial amounts of electricity and water to operate. The International Energy Agency estimated that these facilities accounted for approximately 1.5% of global electricity consumption in 2024. Large facilities can also consume up to five million liters of water daily to cool their computing equipment.

These resource requirements have prompted concerns about the expansion of data centers, making government policy and long-term infrastructure planning increasingly important.

The Philippines currently has Executive Order No. 119, which requires government agencies to store classified information locally. However, the policy does not extend to privately held data.

VITRO president and CEO Victor Genuino said the executive order provides an adequate starting point for government data. Expanding the requirement to private companies, however, would require legislation to establish a broader legal framework.

Regional developments highlight the potential economic implications of such a policy. Countries including Vietnam, Indonesia and Malaysia have introduced regulations requiring certain categories of personal and sensitive information to be stored within their borders.

Vietnam requires domestic storage of citizens' personal data under its data localization framework, while Indonesia and Malaysia impose local storage requirements on specific sectors, including finance, healthcare and telecommunications.

These policies form part of a broader regional push to develop digital infrastructure and strengthen domestic control over data.

The differences in infrastructure capacity are already evident. According to Cushman & Wakefield, Malaysia's Johor region had 111 gigawatts of data center capacity as of June, while Jakarta had 356 megawatts. Manila, by comparison, had only 90 megawatts.

The disparity is also reflected in vacancy rates. Manila recorded a data center vacancy rate of 43.6%, significantly higher than Jakarta's 20.4% and Johor's 0.7%.

Despite the capacity gap, the Philippines is preparing for a potential expansion of its data center industry, with VITRO set to become the country's first publicly listed data center operator.

The PLDT Inc. subsidiary plans to offer up to 48.95% of its shares to the public, targeting proceeds of as much as ₱24.2 billion. The funds are intended to support future expansion projects and debt repayment.

A data residency law could provide an additional policy foundation for these investments by creating domestic demand for data storage services. It could also signal the government's commitment to developing the infrastructure needed to support the country's growing digital economy.

As businesses and consumers increasingly depend on cloud computing, online platforms and digital services, data centers have become essential to the country's technological infrastructure. Balancing their economic potential with concerns over electricity and water consumption remains a central challenge as the Philippines seeks to expand its capacity.

Comments